Advertisement

Boris Johnson under pressure to 'urgently explain' why he privately met Sue Gray to discuss handling of partygate report

Labour has called on Boris Johnson to "urgently explain" why he met Sue Gray to discuss her long-awaited report into lockdown-breaking parties in Downing Street.

The pair discussed where Ms Gray believed the Metropolitan Police were with the inquiry, and Whitehall's understanding of where the police were on interviews, Sky News understands.

The revelation of an undisclosed meeting is likely to trigger surprise given the forthcoming report has repeatedly been described as independent.

Further details of the meeting are sketchy, with confusion over whether the inclusion of pictures in the report was discussed and who initiated the meeting.

The prime minister is saying he wants to disclose the maximum available information now to get the issue out of the way so would not have pressured her to drop the report, it is claimed.

The pair would not have discussed the judgements that senior civil servant Ms Gray was preparing to come to in the report, multiple sources say.

A Number 10 spokesperson said: "The prime minister commissioned the investigation led by Sue Gray and has been clear throughout that it should be completely independent.

"As he reiterated again today, the decision on what and when to publish rests entirely with the investigation team and he will respond in Parliament once it concludes."

Earlier, a Downing Street spokesman said he would "not get into specifics" when put to him that Ms Gray's team had been in contact with the prime minister about the forthcoming report.

Politics Hub: Ministers prepare for 'stomach churning' partygate report - live updates

Asked whether Downing Street was negotiating over who is named in Ms Gray's report, the spokesman added: "Sue Gray is compiling the report independently and how she does that, and the contents of it, and what is presented is entirely a matter for her."

However, all sides are likely to argue the meeting was above board given Mr Johnson commissioned the report.

Earlier in the process there were robust procedures to ensure Number 10 did not know about the contents of the interim report.

The meeting is understood to have taken place on a date before the Commons voted to refer Mr Johnson to the privileges committee which happened on 21 April.

Labour's deputy leader Angela Rayner called on the prime minister to "urgently explain" why the "secret meeting" had taken place.

She said public confidence in the process had already been "depleted", and people "deserve to know the truth".

"This is a Prime Minister incapable of taking responsibility for the rotten culture he has created in Downing Street or of doing the decent thing," she added.

"The Sue Gray report must be published in full and with all accompanying evidence."

Read more: What is the Sue Gray report and what can we expect from the full findings?

On Thursday, the Metropolitan Police confirmed they had ended their investigation into lockdown-breaking parties in Downing Street and Whitehall, and had given out 126 fines for 83 people.

The £460,000 investigation into the partygate scandal, which has lasted nearly four months, has already resulted in fines for the PM, his wife Carrie Johnson, and Chancellor Rishi Sunak over a birthday gathering for the prime minister.

Sky News understands that Carrie Johnson has also been told there will be no further action against her.

Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer, who has called for Mr Johnson to quit over his fine, said the investigation had shown "industrial scale law breaking in Downing Street... that reflects a culture and the prime minister sets the culture".

The conclusion of the police investigation clears the way for Ms Gray's report into the parties to be published in full.

A source close to her team said the aim was to publish it as soon as possible, with next week likely.

Sky News understands discussions about whether or not to name senior civil servants who have been awarded fines are ongoing.

Mr Johnson also faces a parliamentary investigation into whether he misled the House of Commons about the parties.